|Publication number||US7253620 B1|
|Application number||US 11/075,415|
|Publication date||7 Aug 2007|
|Filing date||8 Mar 2005|
|Priority date||8 Mar 2004|
|Also published as||US7880466, US20070225591|
|Publication number||075415, 11075415, US 7253620 B1, US 7253620B1, US-B1-7253620, US7253620 B1, US7253620B1|
|Inventors||John Andrew Derbyshire, Daniel Alfredo Herzka, Elliot R. McVeigh|
|Original Assignee||United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary, Department Of Health And Human Services|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (3), Non-Patent Citations (27), Referenced by (48), Classifications (9), Legal Events (3)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) of provisional U.S. patent application No. 60/551,273, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Generally, the invention relates to magnetic resonance imaging. More particularly, the invention relates to systems and methods that employ the inherent spectral selectivity of the steady-state free precession (SSFP) pulse sequence to provide a spectral band of suppression.
Recently, there has been much interest in the imaging sequence known as fast imaging with steady state precession (FISP). FISP is an imaging sequence that employs balanced steady-state free precession (SSFP), thereby recycling the magnetization, and providing a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) that is practically independent of the sequence repetition time TR. As used herein, the term SSFP refers to the general NMR phenomenon of steady-state free precession, and the term FISP refers to an SSFP imaging sequence with fully balanced gradients in each TR.
Fat, especially subcutaneous tissue, generates large signals. These can be a source of artifacts such as Gibbs ringing, and may interfere with the signals of interest by partial volume effects or by obscuring the origin of the signal (e.g., blood). For many practical implementations, the TR of the FISP sequence is such that the contributions of fat in the image are phased-opposed to those of water, leading to destructive interference in pixels with partial volumes of water and fat. Also, methods requiring a reference image (e.g., SENSE) can be corrupted by large fat signals. Fat surrounding the coronary arteries is also detrimental in coronary artery imaging (CAI) since it can obscure the artery or confound signal from contrast-enhanced blood. It is, therefore, often desirable to suppress the contribution of fat signals in the image.
Most common fat attenuation methods rely on the differing evolution of water and fat by, e.g., frequency or relaxation. They thus require significant evolution time to perform selective suppression, and are generally only effective during a limited time-window at a specific delay after application. More recently, methods have been proposed for performing fat suppression or fat/water separations specifically during FISP acquisitions. These methods require phase-cycling or multiple acquisitions, at least doubling the scan time, and are therefore non-ideal for use with real-time imaging. A single acquisition, phase-based postprocessing method has been proposed, but this approach identifies whole voxels as either fat or water and hence will suffer from partial volume effects.
It would be desirable, therefore, if there were available systems and methods that provide significant attenuation of fat-based signal while maintaining the preferred signal level for water-based tissues provided by standard FISP.
An idealized SSFP sequence generates echo signals at approximately half the pulse repetition interval, i.e., TR/2, between RF pulses. Such echoes differ from conventional spin echoes in that such echo signals may have both positively and negatively phased spectral components. Isochromats that precess an approximately even number of cycles during the pulse repetition interval, TR, yield echoes in-phase with on-resonance isochromats, and vice versa. Accordingly, water and fat isochromats may be partitioned into respective spectral components. For example, as fat has a chemical shift of 3.3 ppm (210 Hz at 1.5 T), an SSFP sequence with 2.4<TR<7.1 ms generates echoes with fat in anti-phase to water. Consequently, when the scanner is set on-resonance for water, an SSFP sequence with 2.4 ms<TR<7.1 ms will generate an echo at the TR/2 timepoint with fat signals that are phase-opposed to those from water. Chemical shift increases linearly with field strength, giving a fat/water separation of approximately 420 Hz at 3 T. Accordingly, fat and water will be phase-opposed for 1.2<TR<3.6 ms and 5.9<TR<8.3 ms.
According to the invention, to effect separation, the FISP sequence may be divided into a plurality of relatively short SSFP-trains. Each SSFP-train may include a plurality of RF pulses, for example, 8 to 64 RF pulses. Between successive SSFP-trains, the water isochromats may be z-stored. Residual transverse magnetization, including spins that were phased-opposed to the on-resonance water, may then be gradient-crushed and RF-spoiled, by changing the scanner exciter and receiver phase, for example. The stored magnetization may then be re-excited using, for example, a linearly ramped opening sequence method or an α/2-TR/2 opening sequence method, with very little disturbance to the steady-state water signal.
It has been found that the additional time required to play the sequence may be about 1–2 TRs, which does not significantly affect imaging efficiency. To effect greater suppression, the flip angle may also be ramped up, to 90°, for example, just before the end of the SSFP-train. Considering each SSFP-train as a sequence unit, the effect on fat is similar to a conventional gradient- and RF-spoiled sequence. For water, there is no spoiling, and the sequence retains the SSFP qualities of FISP.
An improvement to the FISP imaging sequence that provides an efficient method for fat-suppression has been developed. The method avoids interrupting the SSFP steady state for a lengthy period while an explicit fat-saturation sequence is played out. The length of the SSFP-train is a parameter that may be considered in implementing the method. Preferably, the train should be short enough for gradient and RF-spoiling to be effective, and yet long enough for the fat/water isochromats to become properly phase opposed.
The method is particularly useful with continuous imaging methods. When image datasets are to be acquired using multiple SSFP-trains, phase-encoding steps can be interleaved between SSFP-trains, permitting view-shared imaging in which reconstruction frame rate exceeds true acquisition frame rate. The method is expected to work well in combination with magnetization preparation methods (e.g., inversion-recovery (IR) perfusion).
It has previously been shown that an SSFP sequence comprising a train of phase-alternated, α-flip angle RF pulses generate echo signal (similar to spin-echoes) at a time-point TE≈TR/2 from the mid-points of the RF pulses. Echoes generated under SSFP differ from conventional spin-echoes in that they may be formed with either positive or negative phase depending on the amount of precession experienced in each TR. Isochromats that precess approximately an even number of complete cycles in one TR form an echo in-phase with on-resonance isochromats, while those that precess approximately an odd number of cycles yield signal with opposing phase. That is, the echoes from isochromats with off-resonance frequency Δω satisfy:
This effect, shown in
Thus, according to the invention, this inherent spectral selectivity may be exploited to provide water selection and fat suppression. For example, with a scanner center frequency (i.e., 0 Hz) set for water, fat (chemical shift=3.35 ppm) has a resonance frequency 214 Hz at 1.5 T, so any SSFP sequence with 2.3 ms<TR<7.0 ms will generate an echo at t=TR/2 with fat signal phase-opposed to those from water. It should be understood, however, that the invention may be generalized to provide alternate spectral separations.
As the water-fat separation angle, ζ, (i.e., the angle between the water and fat isochromats just prior to z-storage) is increased towards 90°, the residual longitudinal fat component (after z-storage and gradient crushing) may be reduced, and hence improved suppression may be achieved. In the sequence discussed above, ζ=α, the SSFP flip angle, so it is expected that the degree of suppression will increase with flip angle. However, it may be unfeasible to apply very large flip angles (e.g., α>60°) for the whole SSFP-train due to limitations on energy deposition and also because of undesirable effects on the overall image contrast.
An effective water-fat separation angle ζ>α may be achieved by employing a closing subsequence at the end of the SSFP-train comprising Nclose RF pulses with flip angle
where 0≦i<Nclose is the pulse index in the closing subsequence. The subsequence gradually increases the water-fat separation angle from α to ζ in uniform steps. In particular, employing ζ=90° should achieve significantly improved suppression which theoretically completely crushes the fat magnetization component.
Data collected during the closing sequence will provide increased signal levels due to the increased transverse component of the magnetization. Defining φ[i] to be the angle between the magnetization and the z-axis after the ith closing pulse, these data can be re-scaled to normal SSFP signal levels by multiplication by sin(α/2)/sin(φ[i]). For example during SSFP with α=45° the magnetization will lie at an angle 22.5° to the z-axis and water-fat separation of 45°. For Nclose=5 and ζ=90°, the following closing series may be obtained
SSFP Closing Sequence pulse index α 0 1 2 3 4 flip angle ±45.0° ±49.5° ±58.5° ±67.5° ±76.5° ±85.5° angle to z- 22.5° 27° 31.5° 36° 40.5° 45° axis: φ water-fat 45° 54° 63° 72° 81° 90° angle: ζ
followed by a ζ/2=45° pulse played at the echo time that z-stores the water and fully excites the fat magnetization.
Though the method described above causes the suppression of fat isochromats, the water isochromats, which were stored along the longitudinal axis, have a magnitude that is essentially unaffected by the closing sequence, apart from a small amount of T1 relaxation. In restarting the SSFP-train, the opening sequence must rapidly separate the spectral components into in-phase and phase-opposed echoes without incurring a lengthy transition period.
An (α/2−TR/2) combination is often used to restart SSFP sequences that have been interrupted to perform explicit magnetization preparation (e.g., tagging). However, this opening subsequence generates undesirable transient behavior from isochromats in the off-resonant bands, such as the fat discussed above. Even though signal from fat has been greatly suppressed, it may still be advantageous to start with a sequence with a smooth transition to steady-state. Opening subsequences employing a linearly ramped flip angle and full TR RF pulse separations have been proposed to provide a rapid separation of the fat and water components into phase-opposed echoes at TE. These are particularly effective where, as here, the fat isochromats have recently been nulled, and are growing back from very small magnitude. Excellent results may be obtained using as few as Nopen=5 RF pulses:
which linearly increases the angle of magnetization from the z-axis. Data acquisition can begin with the first RF pulse and, similarly to the closing sequence, be rescaled to account for the use of lower excitation angles by multiplication by sin(α/2)/sin(φ[i]), where φ[i]=iα/2Nopen, where the subsequence index i=0, . . . , Nopen−1.
The incorporation of RF-spoiling between successive SSFP-trains provides further suppression of the unwanted spectral component. Generally, RF spoiling is extremely effective in reducing the coherence of transverse magnetization excited in one block with that in subsequent blocks of the sequence. The method is implemented by applying a linearly increasing phase increment to the RF transmitter and receiver between successive sequence blocks (typically the phase increment increases by 117° each block). For a conventional gradient echo imaging sequence, a block is one TR of the sequence. For the S5FP method, however, one block represents the duration of one train of SSFP pulses including their opening, closing, and z-storing subsequences. The interval between successive blocks should be less than the T2 of the component to be suppressed, setting an upper bound on the SSFP-train duration.
The process of performing short SSFP-trains with intervening crushing and spoiling of the unwanted fat spectral component is repeated regularly to suppress re-growth of the fat signal over time.
Simplistically, considering each whole SSFP-train to be a single repetition unit of the pulse sequence, the effect of the method on fat isochromats can be seen to be similar to that of a conventional RF-spoiled gradient echo sequence with flip angle ζ and TR equal to the duration of the entire SSFP-train. Water isochromats, which begin and end the train z-stored, are essentially immune to the large effective flip angle and the RF spoiling and retain the SSFP contrast of FISP. The acquisition and rescaling of data during the opening and closing sequences greatly improves the efficiency of the method, such that the only temporal overheads versus conventional FISP are those required for: SSFP echo formation at TE, the z-storage pulse, and the gradient crushing of residual magnetization, typically amounting to about 1 TR.
Computer simulations were performed to obtain the steady-state magnetization response as a function of off-resonance frequency. The performance of (i) standard SSFP; (ii) S5FP with gradient crushing applied between trains but RF spoiling disabled; and (iii) S5FP with both gradient crushing and RF spoiling were compared. Multiple isochromats (Niso), each corresponding to a given off-resonance frequency, were tracked as the sequence played out. Individual RF pulses were treated as being hard pulses with instantaneous effect. Gradient crushing was simulated by following multiple (Ncrush) coherence pathways with precession angles uniformly distributed over −π≦θ<π and taking the mean over all the coherence pathways as the composite isochromat magnetization.
Parameters varied for simulation included (i) RF spoiling phase increment 0° (off) or 117° (on); (ii) the SSFP-train length; the number of RF pulses to be used for the (iii) opening and (iv) closing subsequences; and (v) the final water-fat angle, ζ. Other simulation parameters corresponded to those typically employed in a 256-sample conventional FISP sequence: α=45°, TR=3 ms and relaxation parameters for myocardial muscle (T1/T2=880/80 ms), arterial blood (T1/T2=1200/200 ms) and fat (T1/T2=250/80 ms) at 1.5 T. The magnetization response function was measured at the TE=TR/2, midway between the centers of the two adjacent RF pulses. To allow the magnetization to reach a steady state, the conventional SSFP sequence response was measured on the 1000th TR. To allow the variation of the response throughout the train to be examined, the S5FP response was measured for every TR during the 100th SSFP-train.
Experiments were performed using a 1.5 T GE Signa CV/i MRI scanner (GE Medical Systems, Waukesha, Wis.) equipped with gradients rated for 40 mT/m amplitude and 150 T/m/s slew rate. For parallel imaging (TSENSE) acquisitions employed in the cardiac studies, data were acquired using an 8-channel cardiac phased array coil (Nova Medical, Wilmington, Mass.) via an in-house constructed, external 8 channel receiver system. Experiments involving human volunteers were conducted with full consent under a protocol approved by the NHLBI institutional review board. The basic imaging pulse sequence was previously developed for efficient, continuous imaging with conventional FISP. This sequence was modified to perform S5FP imaging using multiple short SSFP-trains as described above. Sequence options included: the number of TRs in the short-train; the use of a (α/2−TR/2) or ramped opening subsequence with specified numbers of RF pulses; the use of a ramped closing subsequence of particular length and ζ angle; and RF spoiling phase increment 0° (off) or 117° (on). In all cases, data acquisition was performed during both the ramped flip opening and closing subsequences. The additional temporal overhead for performing the sequence was exactly 1 TR per SSFP-train. Data resealing could optionally be performed during off-line data reconstruction.
To validate the simulations of the S5FP response function, a sealed, 5 mm i.d. NMR tube was filled with 0.8 mM Gd-DTPA doped water and placed parallel to the magnet bore in the MRI system. A range of off-resonance frequencies were created by applying a fixed Z-shim offset. Non-phase encoded 1D-projections providing a frequency response similar to the simulations were obtained using the conventional FISP and S5FP sequences. Data were acquired after the system reached steady-state. For the S5FP sequence, data were acquired for each TR in the train to allow the variation of the response throughout the train to be examined. The effects of (i) enabling/disabling RF spoiling; varying (ii) the S5FP-train length; the number of (iii) opening and (iv) closing pulses; and (v) the final water-fat angle, ζ, were studied and compared to the simulation results.
Axial images of a human calf muscle were obtained to investigate the effects of the choice of train-length and final water-fat angle, ζ, on the fat suppression. Images were obtained for conventional FISP and S5FP using identical parameters: 1 ms, α=45° flip angle RF pulses and 256 sample, ±125 kHz receiver bandwidth (RBW) acquisitions with TR=3.3 ms. Opening and closing subsequences comprised 5 RF pulses and 1 RF pulse respectively with gradient and RF-spoiling between trains. Images were acquired with 24 cm field-of-view (FOV) and 8 mm slice thickness with an acquisition matrix of 256×240. Various factorizations of the 240 phase encodes permitted S5FP images to be formed by interleaving short-trains of different lengths. Signal intensity measurements were made on two separate muscle regions-of-interest (ROIs) and four fat ROIs. Twenty images were acquired sequentially and the last 10 were averaged to eliminate the transition into steady-state. Mean and standard deviation for both fat and water signals in the ROIs were recorded.
Ungated time series of cardiac images (similar to real-time imaging) were obtained using FISP and S5FP with 8 mm slice thickness and FOVs of 36×27 cm (short axis) and 36×32.4 cm (long axis).
Identical imaging parameters were employed for both FISP and S5FP: 1 ms, α=45° flip RF pulses and 256 sample, ±125 kHz RBW with TR=3.2 ms. The full raw data matrix for each time-frame was 256×96. TSENSE parallel imaging provided acceleration rates R=3 and R=4 (i.e., 32 and 24 acquired phase encodes per image) for temporal resolutions of 102 ms and 77 ms respectively. Interleaving phase encodes for successive frames provided fully-sampled, lower temporal resolution coil maps. For example, the R=3 acquisition order is: [frame 0] 0, 3, 6, . . . ; [frame 1] 1, 4, 7, . . . ; [frame 2] 2, 5, 8, . . . ; etc., with a map being reconstructed from the combined data for frames 0, 1, and 2. Time series of 120 image frames (R=3) or 160 image frames (R=4) were collected for each sequence. For standard FISP imaging, the sequence ran without interruption with frame rates 13.0 fps and 9.8 fps respectively, corresponding to the temporal resolution. For the S5FP sequence, each short-train corresponded exactly to one TSENSE image frame (i.e., 24 or 32 TRs) including subsequences comprising Nopen=5 RF pulses and Nclose=1 RF pulse with final water-fat angle, ζ=90°. Z-storage and RF spoiling required a 1 TR overhead providing frame rates 12.5 fps and 9.5 fps (i.e., 96% and 97% efficient versus the FISP sequence) respectively.
For the S5FP sequence, the response shown is the 12th TR of a 24 pulse train. Approximately on-resonance isochromats with precession frequencies satisfying
have a similar response profile to those of SSFP, whereas isochromats with precession frequencies in the range
are significantly suppressed, with additional suppression being provided by RF spoiling.
There is remarkably good agreement between simulation results shown (
Thus, it may be seen that the opening subsequence significantly affects the response data for the entire SSFP-train. Furthermore, a smooth opening sequence is advantageous because the efficiency of the sequence is directly related to the ability to acquire data during the return to steady-state. As the opening subsequence length increases, the smoothness of the passband also increases, with little change in the appearance of the stop band. Using Nopen=5 RF pulses provides an excellent response. The conventional α/2−TR/2 catalyzing subsequence provides a passband performance similar to the linearly ramped, 3 RF pulse, full-TR method, although the stopband appears to have a more noisy appearance than for any of the full-TR opening subsequences.
Similar correspondence between simulations and experiments was obtained for the various other tests described above. The specific number of closing pulses did not appear to have a significant impact on either the effectiveness of the spoiling or the transient behavior during the train. In particular, use of ζ=90°, Nclose=1 pulse closing sequence (flipclose=(α+ζ)/2) provided a very similar response to those obtained with as many as 5 closing RF pulses. Using a single closing RF pulse has additional benefits: reduced SAR; reduced exposure to T2 relaxation; and avoids having to rescale the closing sequence data.
Examples of the S5FP method applied to TSENSE rate R=4 accelerated, ungated, continuous cardiac imaging are shown in
Thus, for both long axis (left) and short axis (right) image sets, the S5FP images exhibit a significant fat suppression relative to the FISP images. Furthermore, continuous fat suppression was achieved at a constant level throughout the time-series of images. The degree of fat suppression varies spatially due to regional field inhomogeneities throughout the chest cavity. Note that the scanner's standard preparatory autoshim procedure was used for these acquisitions and no other special effort was made to shim the subject.
TSENSE reconstruction errors, visible as ghosting of the chest wall, in the conventional FISP images are greatly suppressed in the S5FP acquisitions. The S5FP acquisition improves the TSENSE reconstruction in two ways: fat suppression helps avoid signal nulls in the B1 reference maps due to fat-water cancellation and also because the fat in the chest wall, which is the predominant artifact source, is itself suppressed.
The effects of S5FP imaging are modelled as a filter with a periodic-in-frequency transfer function that comprises passbands, transition bands, and stopbands of equal width, 1/(2 TR). Here, 180° phase alternation of successive RF pulses (including the z-store pulse) fixes the scanner center frequency at the center of a S5FP spectral passband. In an alternative implementation, with no RF pulse alternation except a 90° phase shift of the final water storage pulse, the response is shifted so that the scanner center frequency lies in a transition band. The spectral bandwidth selected or rejected by the sequence depends inversely on TR. Ideally, the spectral separation of the S5FP passband and stopband would be the same as the fat-water frequency shift: i.e., approximately 214 Hz at 1.5 T, corresponding to an ideal TR=4.7 ms; or 428 Hz at 3 T corresponding to an ideal 2.3 ms. In practice, the fat and water spectral peaks may not fall at ideal locations in the S5FP response. For a given TR, it is usually advantageous to adjust the scanner center frequency so that the water and fat spectral peaks placed symmetrically with respect to the transition band within a passband and stopband respectively.
At 1.5 T, fat isochromats are phase opposed to water for 2.3 ms<TR<7.0 ms: sufficient for high resolution imaging with up to 3 gradient recalled echo acquisitions with 256 samples and as many as 7 echo acquisitions with 128 samples. TRs in the range 11.7 ms<TR<16.4 ms should also show fat suppression, but such long TRs are likely to generate off-resonance artifacts. At 3 T, fat will be in the phase-opposed band for TRs in the range 1.2 ms<TR<3.5 ms, and also for 5.8 ms<TR<8.2 ms which might be useful for spiral-based FISP sequences.
SSFP-train length is an important parameter for the method, although the duration is of greater importance than the particular number of TRs in the train. The train should be short enough for gradient and RF-spoiling to be effective (i.e., duration≦T2 fat); and yet long enough for the SSFP condition to develop well-formed echoes with fat phase-opposed to water before next closing sequence. Better suppression was achieved when the closing RF pulse was increased towards ζ=90°, although no apparent improvement was found by gradually ramping the flip angle over the last few RF pulses of the train.
The acquisition data during the opening and closing sequences (as described in the theory section) significantly reduces the overhead of the method to as little as 1 TR: i.e., a TR/2 delay until echo formation, the Z-storage RF pulse, and a gradient crusher. Without data resealing, the variation of the angle between the magnetization and the z-axis would yield a modulation of the acquired data. Data resealing corrects this, but also affects noise level during the opening and closing sequences. Note that in an interleaved phase encoding scheme, the rescaled data would only affect the high spatial frequencies. The data resealing method may also be applied to other SSFP sequences employing the linear ramped flip subsequence.
The method works extremely well with continuous, ungated, and real-time imaging methods. Depending on the number of phase encoding steps required, each full image dataset can be acquired using just one, or several interleaved, SSFP-trains. This acquisition scheme has also been shown to be useful for TSENSE accelerated imaging. Fat suppression is maintained at a continuous level throughout the time-series of images, avoiding the artifacts associated with the fat-recovery that result from the sporadic application of fat saturation pulses.
The S5FP method is effective for sequences which repeatedly sample the center of k-space during the imaging process (e.g., projection reconstruction and spiral imaging). A conventional fat-sat method, which only saturates the fat infrequently, can generate artifacts because fat recovery during subsequent imaging causes amplitude and phase discontinuities near the center of k-space. The time-efficiency of S5FP allows more frequent application, providing more consistent amplitude and phase from fat signals.
Most traditional fat suppression methods assume that the water and fat magnetization are not initially distinct, and rely on them evolving differently, either by precessional frequency (chemical-shift) or T1 relaxation time, to effect suppression. A chemically selective RF pulse is usually of fairly significant duration (typically ˜10 ms for a 1.5 T system), so fat saturation may be performed infrequently, allowing significant fat magnetization regrowth during subsequent imaging. Implementation during FISP also necessitates a lengthy interruption of the SSFP process, requiring additional start-up time to re-establish the SSFP steady state. Inversion pulses can also be employed to null the fat signal, but are only effective at a specific evolution time and cannot be used for continuous suppression.
Methods have recently been proposed for SSFP specific spectral separations. The FEMR and LC-SSFP techniques proposed by Vasanawala use phase-cycling to manipulate the SSFP spectral response into a filter with well-defined pass and stop frequency bands. For suitable TRs, water and fat can be placed into the appropriate bands providing spectrally selective images. Hardy et al. propose similar schemes based on cycling the RF flip angle. Overall et al. provide a generalized approach based on the Shinnar-Le Roux algorithm for methods based on periodic cycling of RF amplitude and phase. The multi-point Dixon method for FISP, recently proposed by Reeder et al., is based on acquiring data at 3 or more TEs. It provides a fat-water separation method that is robust to B0 inhomogeneity, but requires the an extended TR, which may itself be an artifact source. The main drawback of these methods is that the imaging time is increased by the order of the phase cycling scheme with a corresponding loss of temporal resolution and/or increased scanning time.
Hargreaves proposed a method for fat-water separation which requires no additional overhead: it simply labels voxels as fat if they are negative in a phase-sensitively reconstructed dataset. The method is simple to implement, but suffers the drawback that each voxel is identified as being either wholly water or fat. The issue of how to assign voxels containing partial volumes of water and fat and the problems caused by destructive interference and resulting signal dropout remain.
Recently, Santos et al proposed a method for continuous fat saturation with real-time SSFP imaging which also employs short SSFP-trains. However, that method attempts to z-store both components of the magnetization at the end of the train by playing an α/2 pulse after a full TR: i.e., relinquishing the inherent spectral selection provided by the SSFP. Instead, spectral selection is then achieved using an explicit (+90°)-TE-(−90°) combination to impart a sinusoidal weighting in Mz according to the resonant offset frequency: repeated inversions causing saturation of the unwanted spectral component. In contrast, S5FP exploits the inherent spectral selection of SSFP sequence to select the spectral band for spoiling. Nonetheless, these two methods may be combined by simply inserting a (+90°)-TE-(−90°) sequence between the SSFP-trains, possibly providing additional suppression, at the expense of increased interruption to the SSFP sequence.
The S5FP method suppresses magnetization in particular off-resonance frequency bands. For the purposes of fat suppression, off-resonance is assumed to be caused by chemical shift. The sequence does not distinguish between chemical shift and off-resonance from other sources such as B0 inhomogeneity. In this respect it is similar to the majority of fat suppression methods relying on chemical shift for selection or suppression including: conventional chem-sat pulses, the LC-SSFP and FEMR methods, the phase-sensitive SSFP reconstruction method, and the real-time method of Santos. Furthermore, frequency pass-and stopbands generated by the S5FP, LC-SSFP, FEMR, and phase sensitive SSFP methods are directly related to the SSFP TR parameter, which may require some tuning for various B0 field strengths. In contrast, the multi-point Dixon method, while chemical-shift based, avoids this inhomogeneity problem by implicitly measuring the local field inhomogeneity as part of the imaging process.
Thus, it has been demonstrated a simple modification to the FISP imaging sequence that efficiently provides fat-suppression while avoiding a lengthy interruption in the SSFP steady state for an explicit fat-saturation sequence. In particular, it has been shown that the SSFP sequence underpinning FISP partitions the magnetization into two spectral groups (i.e., positive and negatively phased echoes) at the TE=TR/2 time-point. For common imaging TRs, water and fat fall into different groups permitting an efficient fat suppression and avoiding the need for an additional evolution time to separate the species. S5FP provides effective suppression of a range of frequencies of bandwidth 1/TR adjacent to a passband of approximately the same size. The method is robust and straightforward to implement on 1.5 T scanners, and should also be applicable at 3 T.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6339332 *||3 Aug 1999||15 Jan 2002||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Method for the operation of a nuclear magnetic resonance tomography apparatus for separating water and fat signals|
|US6456071 *||16 Jul 2001||24 Sep 2002||Universitatsklinikum Freiburg||Method of measuring the magnetic resonance (=NMR) by means of spin echos|
|US7020509 *||14 Aug 2001||28 Mar 2006||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Magnetic resonance tomography apparatus and method employing a true FISP sequence with improved off-resonant behavior of two spin ensembles|
|1||Carr, H.Y., "Steady-state free precession in nuclear magnetic resonance," Phys. Rev., 1958, 112(1), 7 pages of photographs, 1693-1701.|
|2||Crawley, A.P., et al., "Elimination of transverse coherences in FLASH MRI," Magn. Reson. Med., 1988, 8, 248-260.|
|3||Darrasse, L., et al., "Spoiling techniques in very fast TR imaging," in Proc. 7<SUP>th </SUP>Annual meeting SMRM, Book of Abstracts, 1988, vol. 2, p. 611.|
|4||Deimling, M., et al., "Magnetization prepared true FISP imaging," in Proc. 2<SUP>nd </SUP>Annual Meeting SMRM, 1994, vol. 495.|
|5||Derbyshire, J.A., et al., "Gromit: A SSFP imaging sequence employing hardware optimized gradients and just-in-time waveforem synthesis," in Proc. 10<SUP>th </SUP>Annual Meeting ISMRM, 2002, p. 2359.|
|6||Deshpande, V., et al., "Reduction of transient signal oscillations in True-FISP using a linear flip angle series magnetization preparation," Magn. Reson. Med., 2003, 49(1), 151-157.|
|7||Deshpande, V.S., et al., "3D magnetization-prepared true-FISP: A new technique for imaging coronary arteries," Magn. Reson. Med., 2001, 46, 494-502.|
|8||Flamm, S.D., et al., "Coronary artery magnetic resonance angiography," J. Magn. Reson. Imag., 2004, 19, 686-709.|
|9||Hardy, C.J., et al., "Steady-state precession imaging with inherent fat suppression," in Proc. 10<SUP>th </SUP>Annual Meeting ISMRM, 2002, p. 473.|
|10||Hargreaves, B.A., et al., "Fat-suppressed steady-state free precession imaging using phase detection," Magn. Reson. Med., 2003, 50, 210-213.|
|11||Hennig, J., et al., "Optimization of signal behavior in the transition to driven equilibrium in steady-state free precession sequences," Magn. Reson. Med., 2002, 48(5), 801-809.|
|12||Herzka, D.A., et al., "Myocardial tagging with SSFP," Magn. Reson. Med., 2003, 49, 329-340.|
|13||Kellman, P., et al., "Adaptive sensitivity encoding incorporating temporal filtering (TSENSE)," Magn. Reson. Med., 2001, 45, 846-852.|
|14||Morris, H.D. et al., "A wideband multi-channel digital receiver and real-time reconstruction engine for use in a clinical MR scanner," in Proc. 10<SUP>th </SUP>Annual Meeting ISMRM, 2002, p. 61.|
|15||Oppelt, A., et al., "FISP-A new fast MRI sequence," Electromedica, 1986, 54(1), 15-18.|
|16||Overall, W.R., et al., "Steady-state sequence synthesis and its application to efficient fat-suppressed imaging," Magn. Reson. Med., 2003, 50, 550-559.|
|17||Pruessmann, K.P., et al., "Sensitivity encoding fro fast MRI," Magn. Reson. Med., 1999, 42, 952-962.|
|18||Reeder, S.B., et al., "Multicoil Dixon chemical species separation with an interative least-squares estimation method," Magn. Reson. Med., 2004, 51, 35-45.|
|19||Santos, J.A., et al., "Real-time fat suppressed SSFP," in Proc. 11<SUP>th </SUP>Annual Meeting ISMRM., 2003, p. 982.|
|20||Scheffler, K., et al., "Is TrueFISP a gradient-echo or a spin-echo sequence?," Magn. Reson. Med., 2003, 49(2), 395-397.|
|21||Scheffler, K., et al., "Magnetization preparation during the steady state: fat-saturated 3D TrueFISP," Magn. Reson. Med., 2001, 45, 1075-1080.|
|22||Sekihara, K., "Steady-state magnetizations in rapid NMR imaging using small flip angles and short repetition intervals," IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 1987, MI6(2), 157-164.|
|23||Vasanawala, S., et al., "Fluctuating equilibrium MRI," Magn. Reson. Med., 1999, 42, 876-883.|
|24||Vasanawala, S., et al., "Linear combination steady-state free precession MRI," Magn. Reson. Med., 2000, 43, 82-90.|
|25||Zur, Y., et al., "Elimination of the steady-state transverse magnetization in short TR imaging," in Proc. 6<SUP>th </SUP>Annual Meeting SMRM, Book of Abstracts, 1987, vol. 1, p. 440.|
|26||Zur, Y., et al., "Spoiling of transverse magnetization in steady-state sequences," Magn. Reson. Med., 1991, 21, 251-263.|
|27||Zwanenburg, J.J.M., et al., "Steady-state free precession with myocardial tagging: CSPAMM in a single breathhold," Magn. Reson. Med., 2003, 49, 722-730.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7449884 *||4 May 2007||11 Nov 2008||The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University||Enhanced spectral selectivity for steady-state free precession imaging|
|US7538550||4 Oct 2007||26 May 2009||Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc||Magnetic resonance imaging apparatus, magnetic resonance imaging method, scan apparatus, program and storage medium|
|US7560925 *||1 May 2008||14 Jul 2009||The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University||Multiple repetition time steady-state free precession imaging|
|US7564242 *||17 Mar 2008||21 Jul 2009||Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc||MR data acquisition method, MR image construction method, and MRI system|
|US7576537 *||20 Dec 2006||18 Aug 2009||Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc||RF pulse applying method with an MRI apparatus which reduces vertical magnetization|
|US7587231 *||9 Jan 2004||8 Sep 2009||Toshiba America Mri, Inc.||Water fat separated magnetic resonance imaging method and system using steady-state free-precession|
|US7609059 *||12 Mar 2008||27 Oct 2009||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Magnetic resonance method and apparatus with nuclear spins type-specific signal suppression|
|US7663365 *||24 Sep 2008||16 Feb 2010||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||Magnetic resonance imaging apparatus and analysis method for fat suppression effect in magnetic resonance imaging apparatus|
|US7683617 *||21 Jul 2006||23 Mar 2010||Johns Hopkins University||Non-invasive MRI measurement of tissue glycogen|
|US7706586 *||22 Jun 2005||27 Apr 2010||General Electric Company||Real-time structure suppression in ultrasonically scanned volumes|
|US7725156 *||16 Jun 2005||25 May 2010||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Magnetic resonance tomography apparatus and method for representation of tissue with very short T2 relaxation time|
|US7880466||21 May 2007||1 Feb 2011||The United States Of America As Represented By The Department Of Health And Human Services||Spectrally selective suppression with steady-state free precession|
|US7999544||24 Jan 2009||16 Aug 2011||Allegheny-Singer Research Institute||Rapid MRI dynamic imaging using mach|
|US8131046||29 Oct 2008||6 Mar 2012||Allegheny-Singer Research Institute||Magnetic resonance imager using cylindrical offset region of excitation, and method|
|US8198892||22 Apr 2009||12 Jun 2012||Allegheny-Singer Research Institute||Steady-state-free-precession (SSFP) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and method|
|US8208986 *||10 Sep 2008||26 Jun 2012||Duerk Jeffrey L||Steady state dark blood magnetic resonance imaging|
|US8219176||7 Aug 2007||10 Jul 2012||Allegheny-Singer Research Institute||Single coil parallel imaging|
|US8314618 *||26 Mar 2010||20 Nov 2012||University Hospital Of Basel||Magnetic resonance method for quantification of transverse relaxation times|
|US8378679 *||16 Jun 2010||19 Feb 2013||Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc.||Coherent signal acquisition system for MR imaging and spectroscopy|
|US8405394||20 Oct 2009||26 Mar 2013||Allegheny-Singer Research Institute||Targeted acquisition using holistic ordering (TACHO) approach for high signal to noise imaging|
|US8502536 *||8 Apr 2011||6 Aug 2013||Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation||Method for accelerated high resolution chemical species separation for magnetic resonance imaging|
|US8688193||26 Jun 2008||1 Apr 2014||Allegheny-Singer Research Institute||Magnetic resonance imager, method and program which continuously applies steady-state free precession to k-space|
|US8738113||30 Sep 2010||27 May 2014||University Of Utah Research Foundation||Retrospectively correlated turbo spin echo imaging|
|US9594136 *||28 Jun 2011||14 Mar 2017||Hitachi, Ltd.||Magnetic resonance imaging apparatus and RF pulse control method|
|US20050171422 *||9 Jan 2004||4 Aug 2005||Weiguo Zhang||Water fat separated magnetic resonance imaging method and system using steady-state free-precession|
|US20060036154 *||16 Jun 2005||16 Feb 2006||Michael Deimling||Magnetic resonance tomography apparatus and method for representation of tissue with very short T2 relaxation time|
|US20060294061 *||22 Jun 2005||28 Dec 2006||General Electric Company||Real-time structure suppression in ultrasonically scanned volumes|
|US20070145976 *||20 Dec 2006||28 Jun 2007||Kenji Asano||Rf pulse applying method and mri apparatus|
|US20070225591 *||21 May 2007||27 Sep 2007||The Government Of The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary,||Spectrally selective suppression with steady-state free precession|
|US20080084208 *||4 Oct 2007||10 Apr 2008||Yoshikazu Ikezaki||Magnetic resonance imaging apparatus, magnetic resonance imaging method, scan apparatus, program and storage medium|
|US20080157763 *||17 Mar 2008||3 Jul 2008||Mitsuharu Miyoshi||Mr data acquisition method, mr image construction method, and mri system|
|US20080197840 *||21 Jul 2006||21 Aug 2008||Van Zijl Peter C M||Non-Invasive Mri Measurement of Tissue Glycogen|
|US20080221433 *||7 Aug 2007||11 Sep 2008||Allegheny-Singer Research Institute||Single coil parallel imaging|
|US20080224699 *||12 Mar 2008||18 Sep 2008||Timothy Hughes||Magnetic resonance method and apparatus with nuclear spins type-specific signal suppression|
|US20080272778 *||4 May 2007||6 Nov 2008||The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University||Enhanced spectral selectivity for steady-state free precession imaging|
|US20090085566 *||24 Sep 2008||2 Apr 2009||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||Magnetic resonance imaging apparatus and analysis method for fat suppression effect in magnetic resonance imaging apparatus|
|US20090161936 *||24 Jan 2009||25 Jun 2009||Mark Doyle||Rapid MRI dynamic imaging using mach|
|US20090326367 *||26 Jun 2008||31 Dec 2009||Allegheny-Singer Research Institute||Magnetic resonance imager, method and program which continuously applies steady-state free precession to k-space|
|US20100063380 *||10 Sep 2008||11 Mar 2010||Case Western Reserve University||Steady state dark blood magnetic resonance imaging|
|US20100104157 *||29 Oct 2008||29 Apr 2010||Allegheny-Singer Research Institute||Magnetic resonance imager using cylindrical offset region of excitation, and method|
|US20100271020 *||22 Apr 2009||28 Oct 2010||Allegheny-Singer Research Institute||Steady-state-free-precession (SSFP) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and method|
|US20110089945 *||20 Oct 2009||21 Apr 2011||Allegheny-Singer Research Institute||Targeted acquisition using holistic ordering (TACHO) approach for high signal to noise imaging|
|US20110133736 *||16 Jun 2010||9 Jun 2011||Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc.||Coherent Signal Acquisition System for MR Imaging and Spectroscopy|
|US20110215805 *||3 Mar 2010||8 Sep 2011||Allegheny-Singer Research Institute||MRI and method using multi-slice imaging|
|US20110234225 *||26 Mar 2010||29 Sep 2011||University Hospital Of Basel||Magnetic Resonance Method for Quantification of Transverse Relaxation Times|
|US20120256625 *||8 Apr 2011||11 Oct 2012||Walter Francis Block||Method for Accelerated High Resolution Chemical Species Separation for Magnetic Resonance Imaging|
|US20130106417 *||28 Jun 2011||2 May 2013||Kenji Nakanishi||Magnetic resonance imaging apparatus and rf pulse control method|
|WO2010124106A1 *||22 Apr 2010||28 Oct 2010||Allegheny-Singer Research Institute||Steady-state-free-precession (ssfp) magnetic resonance imaging (mri) and method|
|U.S. Classification||324/307, 324/309|
|Cooperative Classification||G01R33/5602, G01R33/483, G01R33/5607, G01R33/5613|
|European Classification||G01R33/561B, G01R33/483|
|6 Jun 2005||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DERBYSHIRE, JOHN ANDREW;HERZKA, DANIEL ALFREDO;MCVEIGH, ELLIOT R.;REEL/FRAME:016096/0740;SIGNING DATES FROM 20050502 TO 20050503
|7 Feb 2011||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|9 Feb 2015||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8