US20130106438A1 - System and method for examining asymetric operations - Google Patents
System and method for examining asymetric operations Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20130106438A1 US20130106438A1 US13/287,053 US201113287053A US2013106438A1 US 20130106438 A1 US20130106438 A1 US 20130106438A1 US 201113287053 A US201113287053 A US 201113287053A US 2013106438 A1 US2013106438 A1 US 2013106438A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- transition
- delay
- logical
- inversion
- inputs
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
- G01R31/00—Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
- G01R31/28—Testing of electronic circuits, e.g. by signal tracer
- G01R31/2851—Testing of integrated circuits [IC]
- G01R31/2882—Testing timing characteristics
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
- G01R31/00—Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
- G01R31/28—Testing of electronic circuits, e.g. by signal tracer
- G01R31/30—Marginal testing, e.g. by varying supply voltage
- G01R31/3016—Delay or race condition test, e.g. race hazard test
Definitions
- the present invention relates to examining operations.
- the present invention relates to a system and method for asymmetric delay measuring.
- a variety of things can impact operations of a device (e.g., manufacturing parameters, environment, temperature, etc.). Adequately isolating the impacts of the various features can be very difficult.
- Electronic devices often include operations that have two aspects of an asymmetric nature that contribute differently to an operation. For example, a time delay associated with a pull up operation and a time delay associated with a pull down operation can be different. The delay to complete the rising transition of the pull up operation can be faster than the delay to complete the falling transition of the pull down operation, or vise versa.
- attempts at detecting and gathering information corresponding to contributions or impacts associated with the delay to complete the pull up rising transitions isolated or distinguishable from information corresponding to contributions or impacts associated with the delay to complete the pull down falling transitions can be very difficult and resource intensive.
- a transition delay measuring method includes oscillating a signal between a first state and a second state and tracking an indication associated with an isolated attribute of the transitions between the states.
- the oscillations can include asymmetric transitions between the first state and the second state and the tracked isolated attribute can be a delay in completing transitions between the first state and second state in one direction or vice versa.
- the asymmetric transitions can include fast transitions that complete a transition between the first state and the second state faster than slower transitions between the second state and the first state or vice versa.
- the tracked indication can be utilized in an analysis of the isolated transition delay characteristics. It is also appreciated that the results of the analysis of the transition delay characteristics can be utilized in further analysis of various features and characteristics (e.g., examination of power consumption associated with leakage currents, analysis of timing associated with asymmetric operations, etc.). In one embodiment, the analysis can include reviewing manufacturing or fabrication processes and examining operating parameters.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an exemplary delay measuring system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an exemplary timing diagram of a count of slow falling transitions in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an exemplary delay measuring system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an exemplary leakage inverter in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 5 is a block diagram of exemplary leakage inverters with MOS components in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention.
- FIG. 6 is a block diagram of an exemplary Muller C-Element in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 7 is a block diagram of an exemplary timing graph in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 8 is a block diagram of exemplary delay measuring system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 9 is a block diagram of an exemplary delay measuring system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 10 is a block diagram of an exemplary delay measuring method in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 11 is a block diagram of an exemplary transition completion detection process in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 12 is a flow chart of an exemplary analysis method in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 13 is a block diagram of exemplary analysis system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- a signal transition delay is measured.
- the transition delay can correspond to a delay from the initiation of an inversion transition to the completion of the inversion transition.
- the transition delays can be asymmetric and an amount of time to complete a pull up or rising transition can be different from an amount of time to complete a pull down or falling transition (e.g., fast rising transition versus slow falling transition, vise versa, etc.).
- the measurement can be associated with an isolated or particular transition direction (e.g., measurement of delay associated with a slow falling transition distinct from delay associated with a fast rising transition, vise versa, etc.).
- the delays can be introduced by a variety of operations (e.g., delay associated with a regular pull up operation versus with waiting for leakage conditions on a pull down operation, delay associated with a pre-charge operation versus a read operation, etc.).
- the indication of delay measurements can be utilized in a variety of different analysis (e.g., analyze manufacturing process compliance and defects, leakage current power consumption, etc.).
- the analysis process can include analyzing a fabrication process and operating parameters based upon the amount of delay time associated with a transition.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of exemplary delay measuring system 100 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- Delay measuring system 100 includes a first transition stage 110 , a second transition stage 120 , and a transition completion detection component 130 .
- the first transition stage 110 and the second transition stage 120 are parallel to one another and included in a ring configuration with the transition completion detection component 130 .
- the first transition stage 110 includes a first component under test 111 and the first transition stage is operable to cause at least one inversion transition.
- the second transition stage 120 includes a second component under test 121 and the second transition stage is operable to cause at least one inversion transition.
- the transition completion detection component 130 is coupled to the first component under test 111 and the second component under test 121 .
- the transition completion detection component is operable to detect an indication of the amount of delay time from initiating an inversion transition to completing the inversion transition. It is appreciated components of exemplary delay measuring system 100 can include a variety of different configurations. Additional different exemplary delay measuring system configurations and components are described in later sections of the present description.
- the indication of the amount of delay time can be based upon the output of the transition completion detection device and can be directed to one aspect (e.g., pull up versus pull down, rising transition versus falling transition, etc.) of an asymmetric delay.
- the indication of a transition delay can isolate delays associated with transitions in one direction (e.g., pull up, rising, etc.) from delays associated with transitions in another direction (e.g., pull down, falling, etc.), or vice versa.
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an exemplary timing diagram of a count of slow falling transitions in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- the rising edges of the count signal 220 are associated with the slow falling transitions of the transition completion detection device output signal 210 .
- the count of the slow falling transitions can be utilized to determine a slow falling transition delay time or time to complete the slow falling transition. It is appreciated that isolated indication or measurement of a transition delay associated with one transition direction can be utilized to refine examination and analysis of characteristics and features associated with the components under test. Additional description of examination and analysis of characteristics and features associated with the components under test is set forth in later sections.
- Transitions stage 110 and 120 can include pull up components and pull down components.
- a component under test can cause a transition itself or impact (e.g., delay, alter, etc.) a transition from another component.
- the component under test 111 and component under test 121 can be inverters.
- An inverter can be a leakage inverter and have a transition delay that is primarily a function of the leakage current.
- the output of the transition stages can be inverted whether or not the component under test 111 and component under test 121 themselves invert their respective inputs.
- the transition stages can include an inverter with a transition delay that is primarily a function of drive current (e.g., saturation current, on current, etc.).
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram of exemplary delay measuring system 300 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- the components under test in delay measuring system 300 are leakage inverters.
- Delay measuring system 300 includes first transition stage 310 , second transition stage 320 , transition completion detection component 330 and control component 350 .
- Transition stage 310 includes leakage inverter 311 and driven inverter 312 .
- Transition stage 320 includes leakage inverter 321 and driven inverter 322 .
- Transition completion detection component 330 includes C-Element 331 and driven inverter 332 .
- leakage inverters 311 and 321 are configured to transition a signal, wherein a leakage current impacts a transition of the signal.
- the leakage current characteristic impacts a transition delay (e.g., a delay from beginning a transition to completing the transition, etc.). The impact can include delaying the transition.
- the leakage current characteristic can impact the rising or pull up transition delay or the falling of pull down transition delay.
- Leakage inverters can be similar to leakage inversion components and systems described in co-pending Application entitled A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EXAMINING LEAKAGE IMPACTS (application Ser. No. ______), incorporated herein by reference.
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an exemplary leakage inverter 400 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- Leakage inverter 400 comprises a pull up component 410 , leakage component 420 and pull down component 430 .
- leakage component 420 is coupled in series between the pull up component 410 and the pull down component 420 .
- the components of leakage inverter 400 cooperatively operate to pull up and pull down a signal.
- pull up component 410 is configurable to perform a pull up operation to pull up a signal
- pull down component 420 is configurable to perform a pull down operation to pull down the signal
- a leakage in leakage component 430 impacts at least one transition of the signal.
- a transition delay associated with the pull down operation is asymmetric with respect to transition delay associated with the pull up operation and the asymmetry is associated with an effect of the leakage current on at least one transition of the signal.
- transitions of the signal are represented by graph 440 with a relatively fast rising transition delay 441 and a relatively slow transition delay 442 .
- the transitions of the signal are represented by graph 450 with a relatively slow rising transition delay 451 and a relatively fast transition delay 452 .
- pull up component 410 , leakage component 420 and pull down component 430 can include a variety of components.
- the leakage component includes a transistor in the off state that gradually allows leakage current to flow.
- the leakage current is strong or large enough to overpower at least one of the pull up or pull down components.
- FIG. 5 is a block diagram of exemplary leakage inverters with MOS components in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention. It is appreciated there are a variety of other leakage inverter configurations.
- Leakage inverter 510 includes a NMOS leakage transistor and leakage inverter 520 includes a PMOS leakage transistor.
- Leakage inverter 510 includes pull up component PMOS transistor 511 , leakage component NMOS leakage transistor 512 and pull down component NMOS transistor 513 .
- the incoming signal is low and pull down component NMOS transistor 513 turns off, pull up component PMOS transistor 511 turns on to perform a pull up operation and leakage component NMOS transistor 512 does not impact an output signal transition to a pulled up value.
- the incoming signal is high and pull up component PMOS transistor 511 turns off, pull down component NMOS transistor 513 turns on to perform a pull down operation but leakage component NMOS transistor 512 impacts the output signal transition.
- leakage inverter 510 As leakage component NMOS transistor 512 is off the pull down transition delay corresponds to a delay for leakage current and corresponding pull down value to “propagate” through the leakage component NMOS transistor 512 .
- the operations of leakage inverter 510 are represented by graph 514 with a relatively fast rising transition delay 517 and a relatively slow falling transition delay 519 .
- Leakage inverter 520 includes pull up component PMOS transistor 521 , leakage component PMOS leakage transistor 522 and pull down component NMOS transistor 523 .
- the incoming signal is high and pull up component PMOS transistor 521 turns off, pull down component NMOS transistor 523 turns on to perform a pull down operation and leakage component PMOS transistor 522 does not impact an output signal transition to a pulled down value.
- the incoming signal is low and pull down component NMOS transistor 523 turns off, pull up component PMOS transistor 521 turns on to perform a pull up operation but leakage component PMOS transistor 522 impacts the output signal transition.
- leakage inverter 520 As leakage component PMOS transistor 522 is off the pull down transition delay corresponds to a delay for leakage current and corresponding pull up value to “propagate” through the leakage component PMOS transistor 522 .
- the operations of leakage inverter 520 are represented by graph 524 with a relatively slow rising transition delay 527 and a relatively fast falling transition delay 529 .
- the C-Element 331 is operable to detect completions of a first type of transition (e.g., pull up, rising, etc.) distinct or isolated from completions of a second type of transition (e.g., pull down, falling, etc.).
- the C-Element component 331 has a plurality of inputs and is operable to output a first value if the value of the plurality of inputs match the first value and the C-Element component continues to output the first value until the plurality of inputs equal a second value, and in response to sensing the plurality of inputs equal to a second value the C-Element component 331 is operable to output the second value.
- FIG. 6 is a block diagram of an exemplary Muller C-Element 600 in accordance with one embodiment.
- Muller C-Element 600 includes NAND logic components 630 and 640 , OR logic gates 610 and 620 . The inputs to OR logic gate 610 are inverted.
- Muller C-Element 600 has two inputs and one output.
- Muller C-Element 600 is operable: to output a logical 0 if the two inputs are both a logical 0 and continue to output a logical 0 until the two inputs are a logical 1; to output a logical 1 if the two inputs are both a logical 1 and continue to output a logical 1 until the two inputs are a logical 0.
- the output does not change if: both inputs are a logical 0 and only one of the inputs changes to a logical 1; or both inputs are a logical 1 and only one of the inputs changes to a logical 0.
- FIG. 7 is a block diagram of exemplary timing graph 700 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- Timing graph 700 corresponds to one exemplary implementation of delay measuring system 300 and illustrates respective signal transitions at points 371 , 372 , 373 , 374 , 375 , 377 , 378 and 379 .
- FIG. 8 is a block diagram of exemplary delay measuring system 800 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- the components of delay measuring system 800 are similar to an embodiment of delay measuring system 300 when NMOS leakage inverters are the components under test.
- Delay measuring system 800 includes first transition stage 810 , second transition stage 820 , transition completion detection component 830 and control component 850 .
- Transition stage 810 includes leakage inverter 811 and driven inverter 812 .
- Transition stage 820 includes leakage inverter 821 and driven inverter 822 .
- Transition completion detection component 830 includes C-Element 831 and driven inverter 832 .
- leakage inverter 811 and leakage inverter 821 include NMOS leakage inverters similar to NMOS leakage inverter 210 and C-Element 831 includes a C-Element similar to C-Element 700 .
- FIG. 9 is a block diagram of exemplary delay measuring system 900 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- Delay measuring system 900 includes memory cells as the devices under test.
- Delay measuring system 900 includes first transition stage 10 , second transition stage 920 , transition completion detection component 930 and control component 850 .
- Transition stage 910 includes dummy random access memory (RAM) column with receiver in test component 911 and driven inverter 912 .
- Transition stage 820 includes dummy RAM column with receiver in test component 921 and driven inverter 922 .
- Transition completion detection component 930 includes C-Element 931 and driven inverter 932 .
- the dummy RAM column with receiver in test components 911 and 912 do not invert the output themselves but rather introduce a delay to the respective inversion transitions at the output from transition stages.
- the driven inverters 912 and 922 invert the signal and dummy RAM column with receiver in test components 911 and 912 cause a delay to the transition of the signal at the output of the transition stages 910 and 920 with respect to the signal state at the input of transition stages 910 and 920 .
- the delay introduced by the dummy RAM column with receiver can correspond to the phase of a memory operation.
- delays introduced by the dummy RAM column with receiver correspond to a bit line pre-charge phase and a read phase.
- delays introduced by different phases of the dummy RAM column with receiver are asymmetric with respect to one another.
- a pre-charge phase can introduce a long or slow delay and the read phase can introduce a short or fast phase or vice versa.
- FIG. 10 is a block diagram of an exemplary delay measuring method 1000 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- a first inversion transition is performed.
- the first inversion can include a logical state inversion (e.g., pull up, pull down, etc.).
- a second inversion transition is performed.
- the first inversion transition and second inversion transition have an asymmetric delay characteristic.
- the first inversion transition is relatively fast compared to the relatively slow second inversion transition.
- a transition completion measurement process associated with the second inversion transition is performed.
- the transition completion measurement process measures an indication of the amount of delay time from initiating the second inversion transition to completing the second inversion transition.
- the transition completion measurement process can also measure an indication of the amount of delay time from initiating the second inversion transition to completing the second inversion transition.
- the indication of the amount of delay time can be a count based upon the output of a transition completion detection process.
- FIG. 11 is a block diagram of exemplary transition completion detection process 1100 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- the logical value of two inputs are examined.
- a logical 0 is output if both of the two inputs are a logical 0 and continuing to output the logical 0 until both inputs are a logical 1.
- a logical 1 is output if both of the two inputs are a logical 1 and continuing to output the logical 1 until both inputs are a logical 0.
- the output does not change logical state if one input is a logical 1 and the other input is a logical 0.
- FIG. 12 is a flow chart of exemplary analysis method 1200 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- an inversion process is performed.
- the inversion process includes pull ups and pull downs.
- the inversion process can include transitions between a logical 1 state and a logical 0 state.
- the inversion process can include introduction of a delay in an output of the inversion transition. The delay can be asymmetric with respect to the direction of the transition (e.g., fast rising transition versus slow falling transition, slow pull up transition versus fast pull down transition, vise versa, etc.).
- an analysis process is performed based upon a delay associated with the inversion process. It is appreciated that a variety of different analyses can be performed.
- an indication associated with a time delay is received and a transition delay time is determined.
- the transition delay is associated with one aspect (e.g., rinsing versus falling, pull up versus pull sown, etc.) of asymmetric transitions.
- characteristics of a device are analyzed based upon the transition delay time. It is appreciated that a variety of characteristics can be analyzed (e.g., manufacturing process compliance and defects, leakage current power consumption, etc.).
- the device analysis process can include analyzing a fabrication process and operating parameters based upon the amount of delay time.
- FIG. 13 is a block diagram of exemplary analysis system 1300 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
- Analysis system 1300 includes delay measuring system 1310 and analysis component 1320 .
- Delay measuring system 1310 includes a first transition stage 1313 , a second transition stage 1314 , a transition completion detection component 1350 and control component 1311 .
- the first transition stage 1131 includes a first component under test 1331 and driven inverter 1332 .
- the second transition stage 1314 includes a second component under test 1341 and driven inverter 1342 .
- Transition completion detection component 1315 includes c-element 1351 and driven inverter 1352 .
- the components of delay measuring system 1310 are similar to components of delay measuring system 100 .
- Analysis component 1320 performs analysis based upon the output 1304 from delay measuring system 1310 . In one embodiment analysis component 1320 performs an analysis process similar to an analysis process of block 1220 .
- an analysis is directed to other aspects beyond leakage current.
- an analysis is directed to other aspects beyond leakage current.
- the concern or examination can be directed to what the static power consumption of the device is. It is appreciated there is a lot of analysis that can be done while examining the delay in the frequency.
- component configurations and operations are simulated in spice and then compared to the measured result with present systems. If the physical implementation is running faster than the simulated version then there is an indication the leakage is higher than expected. In one embodiment, the difference between the PMOS and NMOS leakage is analyzed. This is similar to asymmetric situations.
- ring oscillator One thing that was previously extremely challenging in terms of ring oscillator is how to figure out how much of a characteristic (e.g., delay, power consumption, etc.) is associated with or attributable to NMOS components and how much is associated with or attributable to PMOS components.
- a characteristic e.g., delay, power consumption, etc.
- present systems and methods can be implemented in a variety of situations or environments.
- Present systems and methods can facilitate confirmation of chip compliance with design specifications and detection of manufacturing process irregularities.
- Present systems and methods can facilitate examination and analysis of asymmetric characteristics.
- the output of present systems can include a waveform that is acceptable to a counter.
- a frequency and duty cycle can be determined by a fast transition.
- the present operation examination approaches facilitate utilization of relatively small ring oscillations with asymmetric delay devices that achieve proper polarities.
- the present approaches can also allow for measurement and analysis components (e.g., components of systems 100 , 300 , 800 , 1300 , etc.) to be selectively turned on and off facilitating further conservation of power consumption.
- the present approaches facilitate more monitoring structures to be instantiated than conventional attempts and at a lower area cost.
- the present approaches also facilitate closer monitoring of process and operating parameters.
- program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc., that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types.
- functionality of the program modules may be combined or distributed as desired in various embodiments.
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to examining operations. In particular, the present invention relates to a system and method for asymmetric delay measuring.
- Electronic systems and circuits have made a significant contribution towards the advancement of modern society and are utilized in a number of applications to achieve advantageous results. Numerous electronic technologies such as digital computers, calculators, audio devices, video equipment, and telephone systems have facilitated increased productivity and reduced costs in analyzing and communicating data in most areas of business, science, education and entertainment. The manner in which the electronic devices perform operations can have a significant impact on the performance and end results. However, traditional attempts at accurately analyzing impacts associated with different aspects of how a device operates are often limited and can be very complex and complicated.
- A variety of things can impact operations of a device (e.g., manufacturing parameters, environment, temperature, etc.). Adequately isolating the impacts of the various features can be very difficult. Electronic devices often include operations that have two aspects of an asymmetric nature that contribute differently to an operation. For example, a time delay associated with a pull up operation and a time delay associated with a pull down operation can be different. The delay to complete the rising transition of the pull up operation can be faster than the delay to complete the falling transition of the pull down operation, or vise versa. However, attempts at detecting and gathering information corresponding to contributions or impacts associated with the delay to complete the pull up rising transitions isolated or distinguishable from information corresponding to contributions or impacts associated with the delay to complete the pull down falling transitions can be very difficult and resource intensive.
- Systems and methods for transition delay measuring are presented. In one embodiment, a transition delay measuring method includes oscillating a signal between a first state and a second state and tracking an indication associated with an isolated attribute of the transitions between the states. The oscillations can include asymmetric transitions between the first state and the second state and the tracked isolated attribute can be a delay in completing transitions between the first state and second state in one direction or vice versa. The asymmetric transitions can include fast transitions that complete a transition between the first state and the second state faster than slower transitions between the second state and the first state or vice versa.
- The tracked indication can be utilized in an analysis of the isolated transition delay characteristics. It is also appreciated that the results of the analysis of the transition delay characteristics can be utilized in further analysis of various features and characteristics (e.g., examination of power consumption associated with leakage currents, analysis of timing associated with asymmetric operations, etc.). In one embodiment, the analysis can include reviewing manufacturing or fabrication processes and examining operating parameters.
- The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention by way of example and not by way of limitation. The drawings referred to in this specification should be understood as not being drawn to scale except if specifically noted.
-
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an exemplary delay measuring system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an exemplary timing diagram of a count of slow falling transitions in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an exemplary delay measuring system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an exemplary leakage inverter in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 5 is a block diagram of exemplary leakage inverters with MOS components in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention. -
FIG. 6 is a block diagram of an exemplary Muller C-Element in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 7 is a block diagram of an exemplary timing graph in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 8 is a block diagram of exemplary delay measuring system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 9 is a block diagram of an exemplary delay measuring system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 10 is a block diagram of an exemplary delay measuring method in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 11 is a block diagram of an exemplary transition completion detection process in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 12 is a flow chart of an exemplary analysis method in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 13 is a block diagram of exemplary analysis system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. - Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention will be described in conjunction with the preferred embodiments, it will be understood that they are not intended to limit the invention to these embodiments. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents, which may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Furthermore, in the following detailed description of the present invention, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well known methods, procedures, components, and circuits have not been described in detail as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the present invention.
- It is appreciated that present systems and methods can be implemented in a variety of situations or environments to facilitate a variety of analyses. In one embodiment, a signal transition delay is measured. The transition delay can correspond to a delay from the initiation of an inversion transition to the completion of the inversion transition. The transition delays can be asymmetric and an amount of time to complete a pull up or rising transition can be different from an amount of time to complete a pull down or falling transition (e.g., fast rising transition versus slow falling transition, vise versa, etc.). The measurement can be associated with an isolated or particular transition direction (e.g., measurement of delay associated with a slow falling transition distinct from delay associated with a fast rising transition, vise versa, etc.). The delays can be introduced by a variety of operations (e.g., delay associated with a regular pull up operation versus with waiting for leakage conditions on a pull down operation, delay associated with a pre-charge operation versus a read operation, etc.). The indication of delay measurements can be utilized in a variety of different analysis (e.g., analyze manufacturing process compliance and defects, leakage current power consumption, etc.). The analysis process can include analyzing a fabrication process and operating parameters based upon the amount of delay time associated with a transition.
-
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of exemplary delay measuringsystem 100 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.Delay measuring system 100 includes afirst transition stage 110, asecond transition stage 120, and a transitioncompletion detection component 130. In one embodiment, thefirst transition stage 110 and thesecond transition stage 120 are parallel to one another and included in a ring configuration with the transitioncompletion detection component 130. Thefirst transition stage 110 includes a first component undertest 111 and the first transition stage is operable to cause at least one inversion transition. Thesecond transition stage 120 includes a second component undertest 121 and the second transition stage is operable to cause at least one inversion transition. The transitioncompletion detection component 130 is coupled to the first component undertest 111 and the second component undertest 121. The transition completion detection component is operable to detect an indication of the amount of delay time from initiating an inversion transition to completing the inversion transition. It is appreciated components of exemplarydelay measuring system 100 can include a variety of different configurations. Additional different exemplary delay measuring system configurations and components are described in later sections of the present description. - The indication of the amount of delay time can be based upon the output of the transition completion detection device and can be directed to one aspect (e.g., pull up versus pull down, rising transition versus falling transition, etc.) of an asymmetric delay. In one embodiment, the indication of a transition delay can isolate delays associated with transitions in one direction (e.g., pull up, rising, etc.) from delays associated with transitions in another direction (e.g., pull down, falling, etc.), or vice versa.
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an exemplary timing diagram of a count of slow falling transitions in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The rising edges of thecount signal 220 are associated with the slow falling transitions of the transition completion detectiondevice output signal 210. The count of the slow falling transitions can be utilized to determine a slow falling transition delay time or time to complete the slow falling transition. It is appreciated that isolated indication or measurement of a transition delay associated with one transition direction can be utilized to refine examination and analysis of characteristics and features associated with the components under test. Additional description of examination and analysis of characteristics and features associated with the components under test is set forth in later sections. - It is appreciated that a variety of different components can be included in the transition stages and a transition completion detection component.
Transitions stage - A component under test can cause a transition itself or impact (e.g., delay, alter, etc.) a transition from another component. The component under
test 111 and component undertest 121 can be inverters. An inverter can be a leakage inverter and have a transition delay that is primarily a function of the leakage current. The output of the transition stages can be inverted whether or not the component undertest 111 and component undertest 121 themselves invert their respective inputs. In one embodiment, the transition stages can include an inverter with a transition delay that is primarily a function of drive current (e.g., saturation current, on current, etc.). -
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of exemplarydelay measuring system 300 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The components under test indelay measuring system 300 are leakage inverters. Delay measuringsystem 300 includesfirst transition stage 310,second transition stage 320, transitioncompletion detection component 330 andcontrol component 350.Transition stage 310 includesleakage inverter 311 and driveninverter 312.Transition stage 320 includesleakage inverter 321 and driven inverter 322. Transitioncompletion detection component 330 includes C-Element 331 and driven inverter 332. - In one embodiment,
leakage inverters -
FIG. 4 is a block diagram of anexemplary leakage inverter 400 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.Leakage inverter 400 comprises a pull upcomponent 410,leakage component 420 and pull downcomponent 430. In one exemplary implementation,leakage component 420 is coupled in series between the pull upcomponent 410 and the pull downcomponent 420. The components ofleakage inverter 400 cooperatively operate to pull up and pull down a signal. In one embodiment, pull upcomponent 410 is configurable to perform a pull up operation to pull up a signal, pull downcomponent 420 is configurable to perform a pull down operation to pull down the signal; and a leakage inleakage component 430 impacts at least one transition of the signal. - In one embodiment, a transition delay associated with the pull down operation is asymmetric with respect to transition delay associated with the pull up operation and the asymmetry is associated with an effect of the leakage current on at least one transition of the signal. In one exemplary implementation, transitions of the signal are represented by
graph 440 with a relatively fast risingtransition delay 441 and a relativelyslow transition delay 442. In one exemplary implementation, the transitions of the signal are represented bygraph 450 with a relatively slow risingtransition delay 451 and a relativelyfast transition delay 452. It is appreciated that pull upcomponent 410,leakage component 420 and pull downcomponent 430 can include a variety of components. In one embodiment, the leakage component includes a transistor in the off state that gradually allows leakage current to flow. In one exemplary implementation, the leakage current is strong or large enough to overpower at least one of the pull up or pull down components. -
FIG. 5 is a block diagram of exemplary leakage inverters with MOS components in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention. It is appreciated there are a variety of other leakage inverter configurations.Leakage inverter 510 includes a NMOS leakage transistor andleakage inverter 520 includes a PMOS leakage transistor. -
Leakage inverter 510 includes pull up component PMOS transistor 511, leakage component NMOS leakage transistor 512 and pull down component NMOS transistor 513. In one exemplary implementation, the incoming signal is low and pull down component NMOS transistor 513 turns off, pull up component PMOS transistor 511 turns on to perform a pull up operation and leakage component NMOS transistor 512 does not impact an output signal transition to a pulled up value. In one exemplary implementation, the incoming signal is high and pull up component PMOS transistor 511 turns off, pull down component NMOS transistor 513 turns on to perform a pull down operation but leakage component NMOS transistor 512 impacts the output signal transition. As leakage component NMOS transistor 512 is off the pull down transition delay corresponds to a delay for leakage current and corresponding pull down value to “propagate” through the leakage component NMOS transistor 512. In one embodiment, the operations ofleakage inverter 510 are represented bygraph 514 with a relatively fast rising transition delay 517 and a relatively slow falling transition delay 519. -
Leakage inverter 520 includes pull upcomponent PMOS transistor 521, leakage componentPMOS leakage transistor 522 and pull downcomponent NMOS transistor 523. In one exemplary implementation, the incoming signal is high and pull upcomponent PMOS transistor 521 turns off, pull downcomponent NMOS transistor 523 turns on to perform a pull down operation and leakagecomponent PMOS transistor 522 does not impact an output signal transition to a pulled down value. In one exemplary implementation, the incoming signal is low and pull downcomponent NMOS transistor 523 turns off, pull upcomponent PMOS transistor 521 turns on to perform a pull up operation but leakagecomponent PMOS transistor 522 impacts the output signal transition. As leakagecomponent PMOS transistor 522 is off the pull down transition delay corresponds to a delay for leakage current and corresponding pull up value to “propagate” through the leakagecomponent PMOS transistor 522. In one embodiment, the operations ofleakage inverter 520 are represented bygraph 524 with a relatively slow risingtransition delay 527 and a relatively fast fallingtransition delay 529. - With reference back to
FIG. 3 , in one embodiment, the C-Element 331 is operable to detect completions of a first type of transition (e.g., pull up, rising, etc.) distinct or isolated from completions of a second type of transition (e.g., pull down, falling, etc.). In one exemplary implementation, the C-Element component 331 has a plurality of inputs and is operable to output a first value if the value of the plurality of inputs match the first value and the C-Element component continues to output the first value until the plurality of inputs equal a second value, and in response to sensing the plurality of inputs equal to a second value the C-Element component 331 is operable to output the second value. -
FIG. 6 is a block diagram of an exemplary Muller C-Element 600 in accordance with one embodiment. Muller C-Element 600 includesNAND logic components logic gates logic gate 610 are inverted. Muller C-Element 600 has two inputs and one output. Muller C-Element 600 is operable: to output a logical 0 if the two inputs are both a logical 0 and continue to output a logical 0 until the two inputs are a logical 1; to output a logical 1 if the two inputs are both a logical 1 and continue to output a logical 1 until the two inputs are a logical 0. The output does not change if: both inputs are a logical 0 and only one of the inputs changes to a logical 1; or both inputs are a logical 1 and only one of the inputs changes to a logical 0. -
FIG. 7 is a block diagram of exemplary timing graph 700 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. Timing graph 700 corresponds to one exemplary implementation ofdelay measuring system 300 and illustrates respective signal transitions atpoints -
FIG. 8 is a block diagram of exemplarydelay measuring system 800 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. The components ofdelay measuring system 800 are similar to an embodiment ofdelay measuring system 300 when NMOS leakage inverters are the components under test. Delay measuringsystem 800 includesfirst transition stage 810,second transition stage 820, transitioncompletion detection component 830 andcontrol component 850.Transition stage 810 includesleakage inverter 811 and driveninverter 812.Transition stage 820 includesleakage inverter 821 and driveninverter 822. Transitioncompletion detection component 830 includes C-Element 831 and driveninverter 832. In one embodiment,leakage inverter 811 andleakage inverter 821 include NMOS leakage inverters similar toNMOS leakage inverter 210 and C-Element 831 includes a C-Element similar to C-Element 700. -
FIG. 9 is a block diagram of exemplary delay measuring system 900 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. Delay measuring system 900 includes memory cells as the devices under test. Delay measuring system 900 includes first transition stage 10,second transition stage 920, transition completion detection component 930 andcontrol component 850.Transition stage 910 includes dummy random access memory (RAM) column with receiver intest component 911 and driveninverter 912.Transition stage 820 includes dummy RAM column with receiver intest component 921 and driveninverter 922. Transition completion detection component 930 includes C-Element 931 and driveninverter 932. - In one embodiment, the dummy RAM column with receiver in
test components inverters test components -
FIG. 10 is a block diagram of an exemplarydelay measuring method 1000 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. - In
block 1010, a first inversion transition is performed. The first inversion can include a logical state inversion (e.g., pull up, pull down, etc.). - In
block 1020, a second inversion transition is performed. In one embodiment, the first inversion transition and second inversion transition have an asymmetric delay characteristic. In one exemplary implementation, the first inversion transition is relatively fast compared to the relatively slow second inversion transition. - In
block 1030, a transition completion measurement process associated with the second inversion transition is performed. In one embodiment, the transition completion measurement process measures an indication of the amount of delay time from initiating the second inversion transition to completing the second inversion transition. In one exemplary implementation, the transition completion measurement process can also measure an indication of the amount of delay time from initiating the second inversion transition to completing the second inversion transition. The indication of the amount of delay time can be a count based upon the output of a transition completion detection process. -
FIG. 11 is a block diagram of exemplary transitioncompletion detection process 1100 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. Inblock 1110, the logical value of two inputs are examined. Inblock 1120, a logical 0 is output if both of the two inputs are a logical 0 and continuing to output the logical 0 until both inputs are a logical 1. Inblock 1130, a logical 1 is output if both of the two inputs are a logical 1 and continuing to output the logical 1 until both inputs are a logical 0. In one embodiment ofcompletion detection process 1100, the output does not change logical state if one input is a logical 1 and the other input is a logical 0. -
FIG. 12 is a flow chart ofexemplary analysis method 1200 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. - In
block 1210, an inversion process is performed. In one embodiment, the inversion process includes pull ups and pull downs. The inversion process can include transitions between a logical 1 state and a logical 0 state. The inversion process can include introduction of a delay in an output of the inversion transition. The delay can be asymmetric with respect to the direction of the transition (e.g., fast rising transition versus slow falling transition, slow pull up transition versus fast pull down transition, vise versa, etc.). - In
block 1220, an analysis process is performed based upon a delay associated with the inversion process. It is appreciated that a variety of different analyses can be performed. In one embodiment, an indication associated with a time delay is received and a transition delay time is determined. In one exemplary implementation, the transition delay is associated with one aspect (e.g., rinsing versus falling, pull up versus pull sown, etc.) of asymmetric transitions. In one embodiment, characteristics of a device are analyzed based upon the transition delay time. It is appreciated that a variety of characteristics can be analyzed (e.g., manufacturing process compliance and defects, leakage current power consumption, etc.). The device analysis process can include analyzing a fabrication process and operating parameters based upon the amount of delay time. -
FIG. 13 is a block diagram of exemplary analysis system 1300 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. Analysis system 1300 includesdelay measuring system 1310 andanalysis component 1320. Delay measuringsystem 1310 includes afirst transition stage 1313, asecond transition stage 1314, a transition completion detection component 1350 andcontrol component 1311. The first transition stage 1131 includes a first component undertest 1331 and driveninverter 1332. Thesecond transition stage 1314 includes a second component undertest 1341 and driven inverter 1342. Transitioncompletion detection component 1315 includes c-element 1351 and driveninverter 1352. The components ofdelay measuring system 1310 are similar to components ofdelay measuring system 100.Analysis component 1320 performs analysis based upon theoutput 1304 fromdelay measuring system 1310. In oneembodiment analysis component 1320 performs an analysis process similar to an analysis process ofblock 1220. - In one embodiment, while an indication of leakage current is measured an analysis is directed to other aspects beyond leakage current. In one exemplary implementation, really more concerned with a related but different characteristic. The concern or examination can be directed to what the static power consumption of the device is. It is appreciated there is a lot of analysis that can be done while examining the delay in the frequency. In one embodiment, component configurations and operations are simulated in spice and then compared to the measured result with present systems. If the physical implementation is running faster than the simulated version then there is an indication the leakage is higher than expected. In one embodiment, the difference between the PMOS and NMOS leakage is analyzed. This is similar to asymmetric situations. One thing that was previously extremely challenging in terms of ring oscillator is how to figure out how much of a characteristic (e.g., delay, power consumption, etc.) is associated with or attributable to NMOS components and how much is associated with or attributable to PMOS components.
- It is appreciated that present systems and methods can be implemented in a variety of situations or environments. Present systems and methods can facilitate confirmation of chip compliance with design specifications and detection of manufacturing process irregularities. Present systems and methods can facilitate examination and analysis of asymmetric characteristics. The output of present systems can include a waveform that is acceptable to a counter. In one embodiment, there is a 50% duty cycle output similar to a clock, with frequency and duty cycle both determined by a slow transition, which can be used to drive a counter. It one embodiment, a frequency and duty cycle can be determined by a fast transition. In one exemplary implementation, the present operation examination approaches facilitate utilization of relatively small ring oscillations with asymmetric delay devices that achieve proper polarities. The present approaches can also allow for measurement and analysis components (e.g., components of
systems - Portions of the detailed description are presented and discussed in terms of a method. Although steps and sequencing thereof are disclosed in figures herein describing the operations of this method, such steps and sequencing are exemplary. Embodiments are well suited to performing various other steps or variations of the steps recited in the flowchart of the figure herein, and in a sequence other than that depicted and described herein.
- Some portions of the detailed description are presented in terms of procedures, steps, logic blocks, processing, and other symbolic representations of operations on data bits that can be performed within a computer memory. These descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in the data processing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. A procedure, computer-executed step, logic block, process, etc., is here, and generally, conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of steps or instructions leading to a desired result. The steps include physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical, magnetic, optical or quantum signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared, and otherwise manipulated in a computer system. It has proven convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers, or the like.
- It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the following discussions, it is appreciated that throughout, discussions utilizing terms such as “processing”, “computing”, “calculating”, “determining”, “displaying”, “accessing,” “writing,” “including,” “storing,” “transmitting,” “traversing,” “associating,” “identifying” or the like, refer to the action and processes of a computer system, or similar electronic computing device, that manipulates and transforms data represented as physical (electronic) quantities within the computer system's registers and memories into other data similarly represented as physical quantities within the computer system memories or registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices.
- Some embodiments may be described in the general context of computer-executable instructions, such as program modules, executed by one or more computers or other devices. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc., that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Typically the functionality of the program modules may be combined or distributed as desired in various embodiments.
- The foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed, and obviously many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical application, to thereby enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the Claims appended hereto and their equivalents.
Claims (20)
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/287,053 US8952705B2 (en) | 2011-11-01 | 2011-11-01 | System and method for examining asymetric operations |
US13/358,387 US9448125B2 (en) | 2011-11-01 | 2012-01-25 | Determining on-chip voltage and temperature |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/287,053 US8952705B2 (en) | 2011-11-01 | 2011-11-01 | System and method for examining asymetric operations |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20130106438A1 true US20130106438A1 (en) | 2013-05-02 |
US8952705B2 US8952705B2 (en) | 2015-02-10 |
Family
ID=48171753
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/287,053 Active 2032-07-16 US8952705B2 (en) | 2011-11-01 | 2011-11-01 | System and method for examining asymetric operations |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8952705B2 (en) |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9425772B2 (en) | 2011-07-27 | 2016-08-23 | Nvidia Corporation | Coupling resistance and capacitance analysis systems and methods |
US9448125B2 (en) | 2011-11-01 | 2016-09-20 | Nvidia Corporation | Determining on-chip voltage and temperature |
US9496853B2 (en) | 2011-07-22 | 2016-11-15 | Nvidia Corporation | Via resistance analysis systems and methods |
US20170219649A1 (en) * | 2014-06-25 | 2017-08-03 | Southeast University | Process Corner Detection Circuit Based on Self-Timing Oscillation Ring |
US9835684B2 (en) | 2013-02-08 | 2017-12-05 | Nvidia Corporation | In-circuit test structure for printed circuit board |
Citations (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5553276A (en) * | 1993-06-30 | 1996-09-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Self-time processor with dynamic clock generator having plurality of tracking elements for outputting sequencing signals to functional units |
US5835553A (en) * | 1995-04-20 | 1998-11-10 | Nec Corporation | Semiconductor integrated circuit having a digital temperature sensor circuit |
US5973507A (en) * | 1995-06-13 | 1999-10-26 | Fujitsu Limited | Exclusive-or gate for use in delay using transmission gate circuitry |
US6023430A (en) * | 1997-12-17 | 2000-02-08 | Nec Corporation | Semiconductor memory device asynchronously communicable with external device and asynchronous access controller for data access |
US6242960B1 (en) * | 1999-04-08 | 2001-06-05 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Internal clock signal generating circuit employing pulse generator |
US6535013B2 (en) * | 2000-12-28 | 2003-03-18 | Intel Corporation | Parameter variation probing technique |
US6724225B2 (en) * | 2001-06-07 | 2004-04-20 | Ibm Corporation | Logic circuit for true and complement signal generator |
US20050007154A1 (en) * | 2003-07-07 | 2005-01-13 | Patella Benjamin J. | System and method for evaluating the speed of a circuit |
US7332937B2 (en) * | 2005-12-28 | 2008-02-19 | Intel Corporation | Dynamic logic with adaptive keeper |
US20090045834A1 (en) * | 2007-08-17 | 2009-02-19 | Raytheon Company | Digital circuits with adaptive resistance to single event upset |
US20100102891A1 (en) * | 2008-10-23 | 2010-04-29 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Oscillator device and methods thereof |
US20100189160A1 (en) * | 2009-01-29 | 2010-07-29 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Temperature sensing circuit of semiconductor device |
US8143919B2 (en) * | 2003-10-31 | 2012-03-27 | Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. | Semiconductor device and a display device |
US8193833B2 (en) * | 2010-02-10 | 2012-06-05 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Semiconductor integrated circuit for monitoring characteristics of a semiconductor chip |
Family Cites Families (40)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0334983A1 (en) | 1988-03-31 | 1989-10-04 | Deutsche ITT Industries GmbH | Integrated CMOS/NMOS circuit |
KR20010035660A (en) | 1999-10-01 | 2001-05-07 | 김영환 | A method of measuring delay time due to interconnections |
JP4103280B2 (en) | 1999-12-24 | 2008-06-18 | 株式会社デンソー | Mechanical quantity sensor device |
WO2001089088A1 (en) | 2000-05-11 | 2001-11-22 | Multigig Limited | Electronic pulse generator and oscillator |
US6535071B2 (en) | 2001-05-17 | 2003-03-18 | Micron Technology, Inc. | CMOS voltage controlled phase shift oscillator |
DE10131675B4 (en) | 2001-06-29 | 2005-04-07 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Circuit arrangement and method for determining a time constant of a storage capacitor of a memory cell of a semiconductor memory |
US6853259B2 (en) | 2001-08-15 | 2005-02-08 | Gallitzin Allegheny Llc | Ring oscillator dynamic adjustments for auto calibration |
JP2003168959A (en) | 2001-11-30 | 2003-06-13 | Sharp Corp | Oscillation circuit, step-up circuit, non-volatile memory device and semiconductor device |
US6882172B1 (en) | 2002-04-16 | 2005-04-19 | Transmeta Corporation | System and method for measuring transistor leakage current with a ring oscillator |
US6854100B1 (en) | 2002-08-27 | 2005-02-08 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company | Methodology to characterize metal sheet resistance of copper damascene process |
US6801096B1 (en) | 2003-01-22 | 2004-10-05 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Ring oscillator with embedded scatterometry grate array |
TWI234834B (en) | 2003-03-31 | 2005-06-21 | Macronix Int Co Ltd | Inkless wafer test method |
US7069525B2 (en) | 2003-07-18 | 2006-06-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for determining characteristics of MOS devices |
KR100549621B1 (en) | 2003-11-25 | 2006-02-03 | 주식회사 하이닉스반도체 | Oscillator for self refresh |
US7282975B2 (en) | 2003-12-31 | 2007-10-16 | Intel Corporation | Apparatus and method to control self-timed and synchronous systems |
DE102004001668B4 (en) | 2004-01-12 | 2007-09-13 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Electronic circuit with a circuit arrangement for determining and evaluating the operating temperature |
US7151417B1 (en) | 2004-06-16 | 2006-12-19 | Transmeta Corporation | System and method for characterizing a potential distribution |
US7098691B2 (en) | 2004-07-27 | 2006-08-29 | Easic Corporation | Structured integrated circuit device |
US7085658B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2006-08-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for rapid inline measurement of parameter spreads and defects in integrated circuit chips |
US20060178857A1 (en) | 2005-02-10 | 2006-08-10 | Barajas Leandro G | Quasi-redundant smart sensing topology |
KR100657171B1 (en) | 2005-04-29 | 2006-12-20 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Refresh control circuit and method of controlling refresh |
US7365611B2 (en) | 2005-06-01 | 2008-04-29 | Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. | Element substrate, test method for element substrate, and manufacturing method for semiconductor device |
US7489204B2 (en) | 2005-06-30 | 2009-02-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and structure for chip-level testing of wire delay independent of silicon delay |
US7550998B2 (en) | 2005-10-26 | 2009-06-23 | Motorola, Inc. | Inverter circuit having a feedback switch and methods corresponding thereto |
US7592876B2 (en) | 2005-12-08 | 2009-09-22 | Intel Corporation | Leakage oscillator based aging monitor |
US7449966B2 (en) | 2006-05-09 | 2008-11-11 | Intel Corporation | Method and an apparatus to sense supply voltage |
WO2007141870A1 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2007-12-13 | Fujitsu Limited | Ring oscillator for temperature sensor, temperature sensor circuit and semiconductor device provided with such temperature sensor circuit |
KR100849208B1 (en) | 2006-10-24 | 2008-07-31 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Test circuit having ring oscillator and method thereof |
US8041518B2 (en) | 2007-05-08 | 2011-10-18 | Globalfoundries Inc. | Determining die test protocols based on process health |
US7760033B2 (en) | 2007-12-31 | 2010-07-20 | Intel Corporation | Ring oscillators for NMOS and PMOS source to drain leakage and gate leakage |
US7642864B2 (en) | 2008-01-29 | 2010-01-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Circuits and design structures for monitoring NBTI (negative bias temperature instability) effect and/or PBTI (positive bias temperature instability) effect |
US8378754B2 (en) | 2008-02-21 | 2013-02-19 | Advantest Corporation | Ring oscillator |
US7908109B2 (en) | 2008-07-08 | 2011-03-15 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Identifying manufacturing disturbances using preliminary electrical test data |
US8247906B2 (en) | 2009-07-06 | 2012-08-21 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. | Supplying power to integrated circuits using a grid matrix formed of through-silicon vias |
TWI439710B (en) | 2009-11-18 | 2014-06-01 | Univ Nat Sun Yat Sen | Testing device for a passive component embedded in sip |
CN102098028A (en) | 2010-10-14 | 2011-06-15 | 中国科学院上海微系统与信息技术研究所 | Complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) ring oscillator based on mixed crystal orientation silicon on insulator (SOI) technology and manufacturing method thereof |
CN103650345A (en) | 2011-07-22 | 2014-03-19 | 辉达公司 | Component analysis systems and methods |
US9425772B2 (en) | 2011-07-27 | 2016-08-23 | Nvidia Corporation | Coupling resistance and capacitance analysis systems and methods |
US9448125B2 (en) | 2011-11-01 | 2016-09-20 | Nvidia Corporation | Determining on-chip voltage and temperature |
US20130106524A1 (en) | 2011-11-01 | 2013-05-02 | Nvidia Corporation | System and method for examining leakage impacts |
-
2011
- 2011-11-01 US US13/287,053 patent/US8952705B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5553276A (en) * | 1993-06-30 | 1996-09-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Self-time processor with dynamic clock generator having plurality of tracking elements for outputting sequencing signals to functional units |
US5835553A (en) * | 1995-04-20 | 1998-11-10 | Nec Corporation | Semiconductor integrated circuit having a digital temperature sensor circuit |
US5973507A (en) * | 1995-06-13 | 1999-10-26 | Fujitsu Limited | Exclusive-or gate for use in delay using transmission gate circuitry |
US6023430A (en) * | 1997-12-17 | 2000-02-08 | Nec Corporation | Semiconductor memory device asynchronously communicable with external device and asynchronous access controller for data access |
US6242960B1 (en) * | 1999-04-08 | 2001-06-05 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Internal clock signal generating circuit employing pulse generator |
US6535013B2 (en) * | 2000-12-28 | 2003-03-18 | Intel Corporation | Parameter variation probing technique |
US6724225B2 (en) * | 2001-06-07 | 2004-04-20 | Ibm Corporation | Logic circuit for true and complement signal generator |
US20050007154A1 (en) * | 2003-07-07 | 2005-01-13 | Patella Benjamin J. | System and method for evaluating the speed of a circuit |
US8143919B2 (en) * | 2003-10-31 | 2012-03-27 | Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. | Semiconductor device and a display device |
US7332937B2 (en) * | 2005-12-28 | 2008-02-19 | Intel Corporation | Dynamic logic with adaptive keeper |
US7795927B2 (en) * | 2007-08-17 | 2010-09-14 | Raytheon Company | Digital circuits with adaptive resistance to single event upset |
US20090045834A1 (en) * | 2007-08-17 | 2009-02-19 | Raytheon Company | Digital circuits with adaptive resistance to single event upset |
US20100102891A1 (en) * | 2008-10-23 | 2010-04-29 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Oscillator device and methods thereof |
US7868706B2 (en) * | 2008-10-23 | 2011-01-11 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Oscillator device and methods thereof |
US20100189160A1 (en) * | 2009-01-29 | 2010-07-29 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Temperature sensing circuit of semiconductor device |
US8193833B2 (en) * | 2010-02-10 | 2012-06-05 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Semiconductor integrated circuit for monitoring characteristics of a semiconductor chip |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9496853B2 (en) | 2011-07-22 | 2016-11-15 | Nvidia Corporation | Via resistance analysis systems and methods |
US9425772B2 (en) | 2011-07-27 | 2016-08-23 | Nvidia Corporation | Coupling resistance and capacitance analysis systems and methods |
US9448125B2 (en) | 2011-11-01 | 2016-09-20 | Nvidia Corporation | Determining on-chip voltage and temperature |
US9835684B2 (en) | 2013-02-08 | 2017-12-05 | Nvidia Corporation | In-circuit test structure for printed circuit board |
US20170219649A1 (en) * | 2014-06-25 | 2017-08-03 | Southeast University | Process Corner Detection Circuit Based on Self-Timing Oscillation Ring |
US10422830B2 (en) * | 2014-06-25 | 2019-09-24 | Southeast University | Process corner detection circuit based on self-timing oscillation ring |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US8952705B2 (en) | 2015-02-10 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
TWI527193B (en) | Method and system of determining on-chip voltage and temperature | |
US8952705B2 (en) | System and method for examining asymetric operations | |
US20130106524A1 (en) | System and method for examining leakage impacts | |
US7368931B2 (en) | On-chip self test circuit and self test method for signal distortion | |
US20090319202A1 (en) | Delay-Based Bias Temperature Instability Recovery Measurements for Characterizing Stress Degradation and Recovery | |
JP2012516629A (en) | Critical path circuit for performance monitoring | |
CN104204822A (en) | Edge triggered calibration | |
US20100262941A1 (en) | Automated Timing Optimization | |
US9460814B2 (en) | Memory tester design for soft error rate (SER) failure analysis | |
CN104535918A (en) | Cross clock domain synchronizer internal constant testing circuit and method | |
CN103176059A (en) | Method, device and frequency meter for measuring pulse width | |
US20220068416A1 (en) | Testing circuit, testing device and testing method thereof | |
US9435861B2 (en) | Efficient scan latch systems and methods | |
CN103996388B (en) | Signal calibration method and signal correction device | |
US8793545B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for clock glitch detection during at-speed testing | |
US20100103712A1 (en) | Memory test device and methods thereof | |
CN102571041B (en) | Method for detecting time delay and time sequence of circuit and method for correcting time delay by using such method | |
JP5731618B2 (en) | Critical path circuit for performance monitoring | |
CN107765100B (en) | Waveform signal pre-judging period analysis method | |
US10162000B2 (en) | Testing an integrated circuit device with multiple testing protocols | |
US20210096171A1 (en) | Method and device for predicting operation parameter of integrated circuit | |
US20040081208A1 (en) | Circuit for control and observation of a scan chain | |
US9906355B2 (en) | On-die signal measurement circuit and method | |
US8947070B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for testing driver writeability strength on an integrated circuit | |
US9324455B2 (en) | Apparatus for measuring signal skew of asynchronous flash memory controller |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: NVIDIA CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ELKIN, ILYAS;POPPE, WOJCIECH JAKUB;REEL/FRAME:027158/0842 Effective date: 20111031 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551) Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 8 |